HTML 33 views 7 min read

New Live Platforms Promise Massive Cuts — How to Turn “70–85%” Promises into Real Money (Jan 3, 2026)

Ads

New Live Platforms Promise Massive Cuts — How to Turn “70–85%” Promises into Real Money (Jan 3, 2026)

On January 2–3, 2026 a small but noisy wave of announcements reminded creators what’s possible: niche, live-first platforms are promising far higher revenue shares than legacy players. But press-release percentages are not the same as reliable payouts. This playbook shows how to evaluate those promises, run fast monetization experiments, and lock the upside — without getting burned. 🎯

Why this matters right now

Digitalage (a unit of Hop‑on, Inc.) published an MVP announcement on January 2, 2026 claiming a creator revenue model that returns 70–85% of revenue to creators for live content — and plans a staged TestFlight rollout. That signal matters because it joins a market where alternatives (Kick, YouTube, Twitch) already offer a wide range of splits and incentives — and creators are voting with their feet. [1]

Quick reality check: a platform saying “you keep 70–85%” is a good headline — but your take-home depends on:
  • What “revenue” they mean (subs, tips, ad rev, sponsorships)
  • Platform/processor/app-store fees deducted before the split
  • Payout frequency, minimums, and local banking rails
  • Contract terms (exclusivity, IP, clawbacks)

How the numbers compare in practice

Representative revenue splits (public sources)

  • Digitalage (press release): claims creators keep 70–85% of revenue (MVP announced Jan 2, 2026). [2]
  • YouTube: creators typically keep ~70% of fan‑funding (Super Chat/Super Thanks/memberships) and ~55% of watch‑page ad revenue. Note: app‑store fees and local taxes can be deducted before the split. [3]
  • Kick: widely reported 95/5 subscription split (creator keeps ~95%). [4]
  • Twitch: standard subscription split historically around 50/50 for many streamers, with partner tiers offering higher splits (70/30 or mid tiers); Twitch has iterated Partner/Plus terms in recent years. [5]

Pricing example: $5 monthly subscription — who gets how much?

PlatformClaimed splitCreator take (approx.)Notes
Digitalage (press PR)70–85%$3.50 → $4.25Press release; details (fees, payout rails) TBD. [6]
YouTube (members / Supers)~70%~$3.5070% after taxes & app‑store fees where applicable. [7]
Kick~95%~$4.75Subscription split widely reported; platform keeps ~5%. [8]
Twitch (base)~50% (up to 70% for partners)$2.50 (or $3.50 if 70/30)Varies by partner status and program rules. [9]
Takeaway: Even a 10–20% difference in share materially changes monthly cashflow. Always model both best‑case and conservative outcomes when evaluating a new platform.

What to validate before you commit (a 10‑point checklist)

1) What counts as “revenue”?
Ads, subs, tips, sponsored placements — confirm which are included in the headline split.
2) Fee waterfall
Ask for a sample paystub: gross → platform cut → payment‑processor & App Store → taxes → net payout.
3) Payout rails
Bank transfer, PayPal, Stripe Connect, stablecoins? Frequency and payout minimums matter. (Faster rails = better cashflow.)
4) Geography
Is the platform supporting creators in your country? Local KYC and tax withholding rules can delay or reduce payments.
5) IP & licensing
Who owns the content? Any exclusive distribution windows or re‑use rights?
6) Clawback & refunds
Do they reverse payments for chargebacks, content takedowns, or policy violations? For how long?
7) Discovery & audience tools
Does the platform have discovery, cross‑posting, and analytics that actually grow your business?
8) Support & disputes
How do you escalate payment problems? Are creators assigned reps? Document SLA commitments.
9) Sustainability
Is the business model funded or burn‑rate dependent? (OTC press releases or VC‑backed launches behave differently.)
10) Contract clarity
Get terms in writing. Verbal promises in PR are not enforceable revenue streams.

How to run a 30‑day monetization experiment (playbook)

Goal

Test whether a new platform can reliably deliver incremental cash (not replace your core income) while you protect your audience and IP.

Step‑by‑step

  1. Week 0 — Preflight: Ask the platform for payout sample, fee waterfall, and KYC timeline. If they can’t provide, treat as high risk. (Document requests.) [10]
  2. Week 1 — Soft launch: Cross‑post one live show or event; promote it to your audience with a one‑time offer (low friction: $2 tip, $5 micro‑membership). Track conversions.
  3. Week 2 — Optimize funnel: Use A/B title, thumbnail, and call‑to‑action copy. Shorten the payment flow (remove extra clicks). Measure conversion % and average order value.
  4. Week 3 — Payment test: Trigger a payout cycle; confirm settlement timing and amount. Reconcile net vs expected after platform and processor fees (use Stripe/PayPal docs as baseline fees — Stripe’s standard US card fee is 2.9% + $0.30). [11]
  5. Week 4 — Decision: If net payouts hit >60–70% of headline promise and audience retention is stable, scale gradually. If not — pause and renegotiate or redirect your audience to your owned channels (newsletter, membership site).

Practical examples & math (real numbers you can copy)

Scenario: You run a 1‑hour live show with 200 viewers; 10% convert to a $5 subscription (20 subs).

  • Gross = 20 × $5 = $100
  • Kick (95%): creator ~ $95 (platform ~$5). [12]
  • Digitalage (70%): creator ~ $70; (85%): creator ~ $85 — but verify deductions. [13]
  • Twitch (50%): creator ~ $50 (or $70 if at 70/30 tier). [14]

Net after Stripe‑like processing (2.9% + $0.30) on $100 ≈ $96.80 — but most platforms absorb card fees before applying their cut, so confirm where the processor fee lands in the waterfall. [15]

Contract negotiation playbook (ask for these items)

  • Written fee waterfall (sample payout for $100 gross) and frequency
  • Guaranteed minimum payout SLA for first 90 days (if platform is incentivizing signups)
  • Non‑exclusivity clause & IP ownership explicitly retained by you
  • Chargeback and refund policy — cap your liability and time window
  • Right to audit: ability to request transaction ledgers on request

Risk checklist — when to walk away

  • No clear payout date or minimums
  • Platform requires exclusivity without minimum guarantees
  • Payouts routed through opaque third parties/OTC shells
  • Little or no discovery/traffic — you’ll be the initial content provider, not the beneficiary of network effects

If a platform can’t show a sample payout or refuses to define the fee waterfall — treat the headline split as marketing, not money. Get everything in writing before you scale.

Fast decisions creators can make today (actionable checklist)

  • Ask the platform for an example payout for a $100 gross event — demand the full waterfall. (You’re allowed to do this.)
  • Run a single cross‑promoted live and request a payout to validate timing.
  • Keep 80%+ of strategic assets off‑platform (email list, Discord community, product storefront).
  • Compare the net (after payment processing) to your current baseline — only scale if net increases ≧ 10–15%.
Short verdict: New live platforms promising 70–95% splits are a genuine opportunity — but treat press releases as hypotheses. Validate the fee waterfall, payout rails, and contractual terms with a small experiment before migrating any significant portion of your audience. 💡

Sources & further reading (selected)

  • Digitalage / Hop‑on press release (MVP announced Jan 2, 2026): claims 70–85% creator revenue share. [16]
  • YouTube partner revenue overview & Super Thanks documentation (creator revenue percentages and fee notes). [17]
  • Kick revenue split reporting (95/5 subscription model widely reported). [18]
  • Twitch Partner / Plus program reporting and historical subscription split discussion. [19]
  • Stripe pricing page (standard US card fees: 2.9% + $0.30) — use this as a payments benchmark. [20]
If you only do two things from this post:
  1. Request a sample payout (full waterfall) in writing before launching on any new platform.
  2. Run a one‑week pilot event and confirm the net payout on your bank statement — then decide whether to scale. 📈

Final summary — what to remember

Headlines about “70–85%” or “95%” are market signals: competition for creators is alive. But the devil is in the fee waterfall, payout rail, and legal terms. Use small experiments, insist on written sample payouts, and keep your owned channels as the source of truth. That’s how you turn press‑release promises into dependable, repeatable revenue. 🚀

References & Sources

accessnewswire.com

1 source
accessnewswire.com
https://www.accessnewswire.com/newsroom/en/computers-technology-and-internet/digitalage-announces-mvp-launch-for-live-creator-first-media-plat-1123548?utm_source=openai
126101316

support.google.com

2 sources
support.google.com
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/72902?hl=en-EN&utm_source=openai
317
support.google.com
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/10878910?hl=en-on&utm_source=openai
7

ranktracker.com

1 source
ranktracker.com
https://www.ranktracker.com/blog/kick-revenue-split/?utm_source=openai
481218

mediapost.com

1 source
mediapost.com
https://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/393006/?utm_source=openai
591419

stripe.com

1 source
stripe.com
https://stripe.com/us/pricing?utm_source=openai
111520

Share this article

Help others discover this content

Comments

0 comments

Join the discussion below.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

About the Author

The All About Making Money Online Crew

We are creators, strategists, and digital hustlers obsessed with uncovering the smartest ways to earn online. Expect actionable tactics, transparent experiments, and honest breakdowns that help you grow revenue streams across content, products, services, and community-driven offers.